Unpacking ANU’s Parking Puzzle: Insights and Implications for Students

Written by: Darcy Franklin

The parking woes at ANU are a hot topic among students, with debates about fairness and consequences at the pinnacle of the university’s parking system. One unsettling rumour floating around suggests that unpaid fines might even jeopardise graduation—a claim that has students clamouring for transparency and clear answers regarding ANU’s parking policies.

In a quest for answers, Observer reached out to ANU in order to uncover the intricacies of its parking system and the impact it’s having on students.

Parking costs to students

For those commuting daily, especially on busy class days, the scenario is far from ideal. Early-bird staff and students often monopolise spots before most classes have started for the day, leaving others to take their chances on illegal parking and fines.

Despite the University’s assurance of fairness, a closer look at the numbers reveals a different story. Consider this: $10.30 grants a student just 3 hours of parking in the heart of campus, a luxury often elusive due to limited free spaces. The pay-as-you-go option, at $16.92 for a full day, assumes a parking spot can even be found—a challenge, given the campus’s 5,600 spaces versus a student population of approximately 22,000 (also boasting an additional 4000 staff members), with 6,500 living on campus (information provided by the ANU).

In stark contrast, the University of Sydney, boasting nearly 70,000 student enrolments, implements a significantly lower fee structure, capping charges at a maximum of $5 for students utilising the pay-as-you-go system.

In an era of rising living costs and stagnant wages, the $16.92 daily parking fee is a significant financial strain for many students, making it an unattainable luxury rather than a practical option. 

Scope of fines and how they compare to other jurisdictions

When compared to parking fines in other jurisdictions, it’s clear that parking violations at ANU will typically cost you an amount that sits well above the norm. ANU’s lowest parking fine is $132, while the ceiling soars up to $700. Comparatively, these figures stand out when juxtaposed with fines in more densely populated areas. For instance, Canberra’s National Capital Authority lists fines ranging from $125 to $625, while Melbourne, accommodating nearly 5.3 million residents, levies fines as low as $92. This stark contrast begs the question of whether ANU’s fines are disproportionately hefty for its primarily student demographic, even if the University is following a set of commonwealth guidelines (as described by the ANU).

How much money does ANU make from fines? 

According to the ANU’s financial report for 2022 (2023 report not yet available), ‘other student charges and fines’ generated $8.5 million, while ‘parking fees’ sat at $6.5 million. However, the report does not specify how much of this sum comes from parking fines alone. An ANU spokesperson indicated that fines only account for a portion of this revenue, but was unable to provide further details on the exact proportion, in comparison to profit made from parking permits and other parking-related fees. 

Despite the revenue presented in the financial reports, the ANU parking system is reported to be operating at a loss, according to ANU’s own statements. This financial aspect underscores questions about the sustainability and effectiveness of ANU’s parking management strategies. 

Fine enforcement  

Questions from these numbers arise about the enforcement and fairness of fines, especially considering some students face multiple fines, which can lead to legal ramifications.

The financial strain of fines is particularly burdensome for off-campus students, as highlighted by data indicating parking fees as ANU’s second most lucrative revenue source within “non-student charges” in the 2022 Annual Report. However, the process for waiving fines lacks transparency, raising significant concerns about fairness and equity, especially for students facing financial hardships.

When seeking specifics on the criteria for fine waivers, the ANU media team responded by questioning the relevance of the reporter’s personal parking history, including instances where three fines were waived during the reporter’s time at ANU. In their response, they questioned whether for transparency’s sake this fact would be mentioned in the article, yet still failed to answer the questions that Observer posed to them about this issue. 

Woroni’s investigation into ANU’s handling of parking infringements reveals procedural complexities and challenges, particularly regarding court proceedings and communication protocols with students. The process, which has resulted in criminal convictions for some individuals, prompts considerations about procedural fairness and clarity. 

Students are required to adhere to strict timelines for response, navigate a range of options for dispute resolution, and face potential consequences such as visa complications and professional setbacks. Financial data indicates a notable allocation of resources towards legal processes compared to fine recovery, prompting questions about the cost-effectiveness of enforcing parking fines. As ANU prepares for upcoming hearings, affected students are encouraged to seek guidance from available support services (free of charge) such as ANUSA’s Legal Service, the ANU Parking Office, and external legal assistance like the Legal Aid Youth Law Centre.

Where this leaves students:

The system’s flaws are evident in its failure to accommodate the diverse needs of ANU’s population, posing challenges to campus accessibility and affordability for all.

Contrary to common assumptions, ANU’s parking system operates at a net loss. This revelation prompts reflections on the system’s sustainability and effectiveness. With students voicing concerns about shouldering excessive financial burdens, there’s a resounding call within the realm of ANU Confessions, “I do not want to pay $200 a semester to spend an hour looking for parking everyday.” Or even simply “Does anyone have an alternative to anu car parking because it should not cost me a month’s wages (to) park a car where I live”. These calls for reform strive for a fair and balanced approach that considers both the university’s needs and students’ financial well-being.

As discussions unfold, it’s crucial for the ANU to uphold transparency, fairness, and student engagement in crafting parking policies that resonate with the university’s ethos to prioritise the well-being of its community. While the ANU’s adherence to government legislation regarding parking on commonwealth land is acknowledged, there’s an opportunity for the University to recognise and address the impact of parking fees on its student population. By fostering open dialogue and considering student perspectives, the ANU can navigate this issue with sensitivity and inclusivity, ensuring a balanced approach that benefits all stakeholders.

Graphics by: Luke Mattiske

Know something we don’t know? Email [email protected] or use our anonymous tip submission.

If you have an issue with this article, or a correction to make, you can contact us at [email protected], submit a formal dispute, or angry react the Facebook post.

Want to get involved? You can write articles, photograph, livestream or do web support. We’re also looking for someone to yell “extra!” outside Davey Lodge at 1AM. Apply today!